Apple vs. Epic: The Final Nail
Apple has just dropped its last legal filing in the epic showdown against Epic Games in the 9th Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals. The Cupertino tech giant claims that Epic lost the first trial because of “unfounded” and “unprecedented” allegations of anti‑competitive behavior—not because of any real legal trouble.
What Happened
- Apple sued Epic over the App Store’s commission model.
- Epic fought back, arguing that Apple’s practices stifle competition.
- In the initial trial, the jury sided with Apple.
- Apple has now filed its last appeal document, wrapping up its engagement in the case.
Why It Matters
Both companies are giants in the tech world, and the outcome could set a precedent that reshapes how digital markets operate. Apple’s victory means it can keep its current commission structure, while Epic’s defeat keeps the door closed on immediate widespread reforms.
In Short
Apple drops the mic on Epic. The legal battle ends, and the tech community will now feel the ripples—whether it’s about app fees, competition, or the ever‑fascinating drama behind the scenes of the digital economy.
Apple vs. Epic – The Legal Showdown
Apple’s Take: They say the court order would force them to tweak the App Store, letting developers use payment options outside Apple’s processing. The company’s confident the change is inevitable.
Epic’s Wobbly Argument
Epic Games claimed they had no concrete proof of being harmed by anti‑steering rules or the proposed changes. Because of that, Apple argues the company lacks standing to file the lawsuit under the California Unfair Competition Law.
Why Epic is on the Wrong Side of the Line
- Epic isn’t an iOS developer.
- Without that статус, they’re not bound by the guidelines Apple talks about.
- Therefore, Apple says:
Epic’s lawsuit is a no‑go because the rules don’t apply to them.
Bottom line: Apple believes it can keep the App Store’s monopoly intact, while Epic’s legal case feels more like a no‑shot from space.
