Auto Agency Blocks EV Owner Choice of Alert Sounds, Leaving Drivers with Default Tone

Auto Agency Blocks EV Owner Choice of Alert Sounds, Leaving Drivers with Default Tone

Why the “Quiet Car” Sound Plan Is Nostril‑Gone for Good

Picture this: you’re driving an electric car at a leisurely 10 mph, humming along, when suddenly your neighbor’s scooter whizzes past, oblivious to your silent cruise. Ugh. That’s the snap‑to‑action reality the U.S. auto safety gurus are wading straight into on Tuesday, July 12.

The Historic Pseudoscience Behind the Decision

  • Electric vehicles are weird hearing‑wise. At low speeds, they’re practically silent beasts—no engine whinny, no exhaust bluster.
  • Congress had a line in the book. We’re required to add engine‑like sounds to EVs and hybrids whenever they’re moving under 18.6 mph (30 km/h). Purpose: let pedestrians, cyclists, and the blind spot‑averse know you’re coming.
  • 2019’s “choice‑tracks” idea. The agency floated a plan letting auto makers play a playlist of pedestrian‑alert tunes. The thought? Give drivers “music room” vibes while keeping people safe.
  • The rethink. In a fiery table‑top meeting, NHTSA decided not to go the playlist route—“not enough data,” they said. The worry? If the rules relax, only a few EV enthusiasts would get a soundtrack they find amusing. Most would just be hearing nothing.

Why Sounds Still Matter Above 18.6 mph

At higher speeds, the world speaks loudly enough—tire hiss, wind rush. So the emphasis on overt sign‑posts drops. NHTSA is fine with that.

The Red‑Shirting Tesla Battle

Remember Feb ’24? Tesla pulled a Class‑Action‑style recall of 578,607 U.S. cars. Reason – the car’s “Boombox” feature could drown out mandatory pedestrian‑warning sounds. Tesla claims this feature allows ear‑piecing music while the car moves; a potential nightmare for someone crossing the street.

Bullet‑Proof Numbers on the Table

  • In 2020, the regulator projected that the signals would averted 2,400 injuries each year—pat. It wouldn’t have cost the auto‑industry more than $40 million (about S$56.3 million) annually, as they’d just need a small, waterproof speaker.
  • On balance, expected savings in injury costs were $250–$320 million per year. That warms the heart.
  • A rough chance that a hybrid is involved in a pedestrian crash is 19% more than a gasoline car. The buzz underscores why a sound cue can’t be left out.
  • Last year, 7,342 pedestrians died in the U.S.—the highest in 43 years. Bicyclist fatalities matched a five‑percent rise to 985. High stakes for the sound debate.

Bottom Line—Where Do We Go From Here?

So what does the regulatory panel do now? Keep the filler‑sound rule rigid. Stick to the good old “engine beep” at low speeds, no optional playlist, maybe a bit of a DJ style in the future. For now, safety beats aesthetics.