Legal Verdict on Indonesia’s Internet Shutdowns
Indonesia’s Constitutional Court ruled that the government’s decision to block internet access during unrest is lawful on Wednesday, Oct 27. Activists warn that this sets a risky example for digital freedom worldwide, especially in the largest democracy by population.
What Happened?
- During the 2019 protests in Papua, authorities throttled online traffic, claiming they wanted to stop potential violence caused by the rapid spread of misinformation.
- Critics argued that the curbs violated free expression and were aimed at smothering dissent.
- The Administration Court had already upheld those restrictions last year.
Judge’s Take
Judge Enny Nurbaningsih, part of a nine‑member panel, said the government’s actions were “within reason” given the threat to public order and in line with the constitution. Seven of the nine judges sided with the administration.
Voices from the Field
- Sasmito Madrim, chair of the Alliance of Independent Journalists, warned that “this could threaten our freedom of press, and eventually our democracy could backslide.”
- Arif Nur Fikri from Kontras expressed concern that the arbitrary restriction on local media could become a pattern again.
Government’s Response
The Communications Ministry’s spokesman, Dedy Permadi, said the government will study the final ruling and use it to shape future decisions on “preventing the spread of internet content that violates the law.”
Background of the 2019 Unrest
The protests ignited in several cities after Papuan students were allegedly face‑palmed with racist remarks. Some demonstrators called for Papua’s independence from Indonesia. During the turmoil, media outlets such as Suara Papua were blocked, and the capital Jakarta experienced similar internet restrictions.
While the government justified the shutdowns as tools to maintain order, civil society remains watchful, demanding that freedom of expression not be sacrificed in the name of public safety.
