Apple Goes Zero‑Charger: What Does That Really Mean?
Apple’s latest phone, the iPhone 12, has just walked out of production lines with a big smile but no charger or earbuds in sight. Customers are flaring up, saying, “Hey Apple, did you run low on chargers?” The company says it’s all about cutting carbon emissions – a noble cause, but the lack of included accessories has sparked a fury.
Why the Curious Move
- Cost‑cutting or Profit‑making? Some believe Apple is stiffening its purse strings to squeeze more revenue from optional accessories.
- Eco‑Friendly Angle? Apple claims the missing charger reduces their carbon footprint – a win for the planet.
- First‑Mover Status? It’s the first major phone brand to ditch chargers entirely. Samsung was rumored to be on the same track, but hasn’t made any official strides.
Environmentally, How Big Is The Impact?
In Australia alone, a whopping 23 million phones sit idle, along with a similar number of unused chargers. Like plastic bags in the trashed, these dormant gadgets contribute to elec‑waste. If we can convince folks to save chargers, perhaps we’ll slash e‑waste and lift the planet’s burden a bit.
Bottom Line
Apple’s charger‑free strategy feels like a double‑edged sword: it may drive extra sales of accessories and help the environment at the same time. Meanwhile, customers are left juggling whether to buy extra gear or hit “Leave it be.” It’s a mix of tech hustle and eco‑persistence that will keep the debate alive for months.
You can reuse a shopping bag, so why not your phone charger?
Just over a decade ago, Australia started to ban single-use plastic bags, starting with South Australia. Today, every state and territory in Australia has enforced the ban except New South Wales — which intends to do so by the end of 2021.
Since South Australia implemented its ban in 2008, state government estimates suggest it has avoided 8,000kg of marine litter each year — and abated more than 4,000 tonnes of greenhouse gas emissions.
The benefits for the environment have been clear. So, why are we so hesitant to do the same for e-waste?
E-waste is a real, but fixable, environmental issue
E‑Waste: The Invisible Trash of the Tech Era
When gadgets go out of style or simply stop working, they become part of what we call e‑waste—all those dead phones, laptops, and chargers that no longer serve their owners. From outdated mobile phones to yesterday’s laptop keyboards, the pile keeps growing.
Why the Numbers Matter
- 4.78 billion people own a mobile phone, which is about 61 % of the global population.
- Chargers alone dump over 51,000 tonnes of e‑waste every year. That’s almost like the weight of 10,000 elephants, only with broken circuitry.
- Each discarded charger could hatch the potential for a new plastic waste cycle if not recycled properly.
What If We Reused Every Charger?
Imagine a world where every user swapped out their old charger for a fresh one from a standardised, cross‑brand system. It would mean:
- Fewer chargers made from raw materials—less mining for rare metals.
- Reduced landfill weight — our planet would breathe a little easier.
- Tech companies could shift focus to durable, adaptable designs, rewarding longevity over the newest blinking screen.
Bottom Line
Reusing chargers and pushing for universal charging standards isn’t just a tech trend; it’s a tiny step toward a cleaner, greener future. Plus, it keeps your hands stationary—no more chasing stray cords across the couch!
Who needs a charger with an Apple logo anyway?
Citing an increase in e-waste and consumer frustration with multiple chargers, the European Parliament has been pushing for standardised chargers for mobile phones, tablets, e-book readers, smart cameras, wearable electronics and other small or medium-sized electronic devices.
This would negate the need for users to buy different chargers for various devices.
Digital consumption is on the rise and unlikely to slow down any time soon. Recycling is one option, but how else can tech companies innovate to reduce environmental harm?
[[nid:481051]]
Of course, there’s no doubt phone companies want people to regularly buy new phones. Apple themselves have been accused of building a feature into phones that slows them down as they get older.
Apple responded by saying this was simply to keep devices running as their batteries became worn down.
But even if this is the case, Apple’s decision to ship phones without chargers would still reduce the use of precious materials. A smaller product box would let Apple fit up to 70 per cent more products onto shipping pallets — reducing carbon emissions from shipping.
However, it remains to be seen exactly how much this would assist in Apple’s environmental goals, especially if many consumers end up buying a charger separately anyway.
Apple equates its recent “climate conscious” changes to the iPhone 12 with removing 450,000 cars from the road annually. The company has a target of becoming carbon-neutral by 2030.
Are wireless chargers the answer?
Apple’s Charging Game: Cost‑Cutting or Plug‑Push?
Apple’s next move is turning heads. Is the company just trimming expenses, or is it nudging everyone toward its new wireless charging accessories?
Why Apple is in the Hot Seat
- Billionaire Status – Apple’s fortune is built largely on hardware sales.
- Product Power – The firm leads with sleek design and premium tech, so each device push feels like a strategic power play.
- Consumer Curiosity – People love convenience, and wireless charging promises a hassle‑free experience.
The Energy Puzzle
Leaving the messy cable behind sounds green, but wireless charging uses about 47 % more power than wired alternatives. That extra energy? It could tip the balance toward an environmental nightmare.
Bottom Line
Apple’s strategy isn’t just about stuffing a phone into a hallway drawer. It’s a juggling act: save money, push brand loyalty, and keep the planet from turning into a power‑hungry hotspot. Whether the budget cuts win over the eco‑heads remains to be seen—yet the buzz alone is enough to keep us all plugged in (or perhaps unplugged).
<img alt="" data-caption="How many unused devices do you have lying around the house?
PHOTO: Pexels ” data-entity-type=”file” data-entity-uuid=”3208a272-3352-484d-94b4-0e8572da1039″ src=”/sites/default/files/inline-images/20201020_devices_pexels.jpg”/>
The case for a universal plug-in charger
Perhaps one solution to the dilemma is device trade-in services, which many companies already offer, including Apple and Samsung.
Apple gives customers a discount on a new device if they trade in their older model, instead of throwing it out. Similar services are offered by third parties such as Optus, Telstra, MobileMonster and Boomerang Buy Back.
Ultimately, however, the best solution would be for tech giants to agree on a universal plug-in charger for all small or medium-sized electronic devices, including mobile phones.
And hopefully, just as we all now take reusable bags to the grocer with us, in a few years we’ll be able to use a common charger for all our devices — and we’ll wonder what all the fuss was about.
Michael Cowling, Associate Professor – Information & Communication Technology (ICT), CQUniversity Australia and Ritesh Chugh, Senior Lecturer/Discipline Lead – Information Systems and Analysis, CQUniversity Australia
This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.
DigitalRecyclingAppleWireless networks and devicesWaste Management
