Who’s suing Kim? AIG’s Big Claim Against a Former Bodyguard
Picture this: a glamorous Paris apartment, a night out, and—bam!—five masked robbers appear, one even waves a plastic police badge. That’s how Kim Kardashian’s 2016 Paris robbery went down. Fast forward a few years, and the insurance giant AIG has decided to take the former bodyguard, Pascal Duvier, to court, demanding a jaw‑dropping £4.7 million (roughly S$8.41 million). Let’s unpack why the insurer is looking for a hefty payout.
The 2016 Heist
- Location: Kim was chilling in a luxury apartment in Paris’s upscale neighborhood.
- The attackers: Five masked men, two wearing fake police uniforms, burst in.
- The scare: She was gagged, tied up, and locked in a bathroom. While she felt utterly shaken, the good news is she escaped physical harm.
- What got stolen: Jewelry worth millions— notably a £3.5 million ring, diamond grillz, and custom necklaces by Kanye West’s designs.
- Insurance response: AIG covered the replacement costs immediately after the robbery.
Key Claims in AIG’s Lawsuit
- Negligence at its finest: AIG accuses Pascal and his outfit, Protect Security, of “negligently” leaving Kim alone in her bedroom.
- Security blunders: The lawsuit cites a broken intercom and a missing lock on the courtyard’s front gate—both missed opportunities for a “coded lock”.
- Concierge missteps: The building’s concierge supposedly lacks proper security training—an essential rubber‑check that didn’t happen.
- Party‑time pivot: Reports suggest Pascal was at a nightclub with Kim’s younger sisters during the raid—an odd party‑time diversion!
What This Means for Kim and the Bodyguard
For Kim, the lawsuit is a reminder that even fame can’t shield you from bad security decisions. For Pascal, it’s a legal headache—and a lesson that standing guard may demand more than just a badge.
What to Watch Next
Keep an eye on the court proceedings; AIG’s demand could reach a blockbuster figure, and the case might just add a new chapter to the reality TV drama we all love. Whether the judge sides with Kim’s side or the insurer’s side, the verdict will definitely make headlines (and probably lead to more sky‑high “security budget” discussions in Hollywood!).
