When Police Duty Turns Into Dark Duty: A Shocking Betrayal in Custody
The Unthinkable Incident
Imagine being handcuffed, ready for an interview, and then finding yourself in the lap of a seasoned investigator… that’s exactly what happened to two women, 28 and 29, in Singapore’s Jurong Police Division. The man? Lee Sze Chiat, a 39‑year‑old Senior Staff Sergeant with 17 years of experience.
What Went Wrong
- While the women were locked up, Lee broke the trust bestowed upon him and molested one victim.
- With the other, he forced her to grope him and even perform sex acts—an undeniable abuse of power.
- All of this unfolded right inside an interview room, the very spot where police should protect, not exploit.
Legal Consequences
The court didn’t hold back. Judge Christopher Tan met Lee’s requisition with a hard stance: one year in prison plus a caning. The judge highlighted that restraints are meant to safeguard, not seal away. Lee’s guilty plea was noted, but the gravity of exploiting someone in custody was clear.
Behind the Scene
- Lee’s activities broke the normal chain of command—he wasn’t assigned to investigate the case yet stepped in.
- He used the lack of CCTV and handcuffs to push his agenda, turning a room for interviews into a playground of misconduct.
- Both victims tried to resist, yet Lee kept pressing, forcibly using them as unwilling partners.
Police and Prosecutors Speak
Deputy Public Prosecutors Marshall Lim and Niranjan Ranjakunalan urged a minimum 13‑month sentence, citing the haunting nature of these crimes. They called Lee’s actions “one of the most serious disciplinary offences a cop can commit.”
Aftermath and Calls for Rectitude
- Police initiated disciplinary proceedings; Lee has been suspended since Dec 26, 2017.
- Officials insisted this case is isolated and vowed that the bulk of the Singapore Police Force still upholds strict, professional conduct.
- Lee’s legal team presented a transformation narrative: ongoing counseling with his wife and church participation.
Remembering the Victims
While the names remain protected by a gag order, the story broadcasts a vital lesson: No self‑regulation, no trust. Police are there to protect, not to prey. This case serves as a stark reminder to re‑affirm the safety and dignity of those under custody.
