Parliament’s New Baby‑No‑Policy: A Reason to Gasp or Cheer?
London – In a move that could split parents and lawmakers alike, the Commons Procedure Committee declared that babies are strictly prohibited from “Chamber,” Westminster Hall, and committee rooms.
Why the Rule Push?
- “Too much fuss?” Historically, a handful of little ones have slipped in and left the debate untouched. However, the committee feels the old rule should stay.
- Some say the policy is a relic that deters potential players: “Will the working culture in Westminster actually keep future MPs away?”
- Beyond parenthood, the theme echoes ongoing concerns about sexual harassment, diversity, and the Parliament’s “old‑school” vibe.
Comparisons: Everyone Else’s Baby‑Friendly Rulebook
- Australia (2016) – Babies lost their “visitor” status, so lawmakers could bring them in to sip a drink or stretch.
- New Zealand (2017) – The Speaker relaxed the law to let mothers feed their babies in the debating chamber.
- U.K. – As of now, no babies. The journey to a more inclusive Parliament seems … delayed.
Stella Creasy’s Baby‑Busting Moment
A pivotal trigger came when Speaker Lindsay Hoyle asked for a review after lawmaker Stella Creasy was told last November that her baby’s presence would violate the rules.
Creasy faced the committee’s recommendations with a mix of defiance and disappointment:
“I’m not surprised they don’t recognise who is put off parliament by its antiquated rules and approach to women who have children and the need to modernise,” she said.
“This committee didn’t speak to a single person outside parliament despite many of us encouraging them to do so.”
Government Response
Prime Minister Boris Johnson’s spokesperson kept calm, stating: “the government is committed to an inclusive parliament, but the rules are a matter for parliamentary authorities.”
Takeaway: The policy layout feels romance‑broken for parents and feel‑free for lawmakers who want bigger families. Whether the UK will adapt to modern parenting norms remains a question worth rooting for.
Follow the next chapters as Parliament tackles the debate.
