Unsettling Flight: Lion Air Jet’s Erratic Moves Before Fatal Crash

Unsettling Flight: Lion Air Jet’s Erratic Moves Before Fatal Crash

Crash of Lion Air’s Boeing 737 Max: What We Know So Far

On a sweltering morning that turned into a nightmare, Lion Air’s 737 Max went from cruising at 28,000 ft to a watery death just minutes after take‑off from Jakarta. The saga began on Sunday when the same aircraft left Bali, already showing “quirky” behaviour that foreshadowed the tragedy.

First Fly‑by Warning Signs

  • After taking off from Denpasar, the jet dipped 875 ft in 27 seconds – a drop that should have been an ascent.
  • Engine noise and a “weird” chill in the cabin sparked concerns from two passengers who posted on Instagram about the air‑conditioning and lighting.
  • Captain Edward Sirait confirmed a technical hiccup during the Denpasar‑Jakarta hop, adding that it was “handled by procedure.”

Post‑Landing Scrutiny

Shockingly, the plane landed in Jakarta at 10:55 pm, leaving engineers a mere 6½ hours to run checks before the fatal flight to Pangkal Pinang at 6:20 am.

FlightRadar24 data revealed odd altitudes and airspeed swings on both the Sunday and Monday flights, hinting at possible issues with the pitot‑static system – those tiny tubes that feed the plane’s computer with altitude and speed data.

What the Numbers Tell Us

  • On Monday, the aircraft reached 2,000 ft two minutes after lift‑off, then dipped another 500 ft before climbing back to 5,000 ft.
  • In the final seconds, the jet accelerated to 345 knots (638 km/h) right before the data disappeared at 3,650 ft.
  • Observers noted an explosive nose‑first splash and a plume of smoke, while the weather stayed clear.

Inside the Aftermath

Pasions from the chaos? Pilots and engineers from other airlines kept silent – the pilot who voiced thoughts didn’t want to be named. Then two fishermen on a nearby boat reported the jet “swayed slightly” as it slammed into the water, a lonely ghostly sigh before the splash.

Meanwhile, CEO Edward Sirait declined to detail the maintenance that followed the Sunday flight. When pressed, the airline forwarded its flight and maintenance logs to Indonesia’s National Transportation Safety Committee (NTSC). NTSC Chairman Soerjanto Tjahjono said the online logs matched the airline’s, but he hadn’t verified every detail.

Lessons From the Past

  • Malaysia Airlines in July landed safely after discarding pitot covers.
  • In 2009, Air France Flight 447 crashed because icing jammed its pitot tubes, a cautionary tale about unreliable speed readings.

Safety experts caution that the investigation is still in its infancy; we’re in the “premise‑stage” now. In the meantime, passengers and crew are left wondering: what went wrong, and how did it slip by, from a cautious “turn‑back” to a brutal dive?

Feel the Story

It’s a rollercoaster: a buzzed‑up jet, a frantic cabin, a sudden plunge, and a baffling mystery. Stay tuned as investigators dive deeper; each line of data brings us one step closer to understanding the hidden cracks that turned a routine flight into a tragic headline.