What’s the Buzz About Joshua Ang and Shannon Low?
Joshua Ang just dropped a bombshell about his divorce, and his former wife Shannon Low is not holding back on the comment section. The back‑and‑forth has ignited a social media storm that’s been buzzing all week.
Joshua’s Wind‑Up
He’s stayed tight‑lipped on Instagram, only flashing a quick note that Shannon’s allegations are completely false and that he’s moving to legal action. No juicy posts or emotional spats—just a polite refusal in a tweet‑style statement.
Shannon’s “Cold‑Hard” Claims
Low went full firecracker on Instagram, looping through a rota of harsh accusations against Joshua. She even tried to haul him into the court system with a Personal Protection Order (PPO) this year—though the judges waved it off.
Joshua’s Low‑Key “I’m Not a Drama King” Mode
He told AsiaOne about his “vacation” into divorce territory, saying:
- “I think this is a personal vendetta between her and myself.”
- “I’ve never posted any nasty stuff about her.”
- “Things happened between us… she did things to me, but I never posted about her.”
When pressed to explain what those “things” actually were, Joshua shrugged: “I don’t want to.” He didn’t want the drama to spill into the public eye, especially with his kid watching the whole thing unfold.
He’s Got a Son to Protect
“My son shouldn’t see all this negativity about his mother,” he said in a firm exhale. Joshua is more focused on keeping his little one out of the conflict.
The “Happy Divorce” Post—What’s the Deal?
Joshua posted a cheeky “Happy Divorce” photo that ruffled some brows. He defended it by saying:
- “It might have upset some netizens and Shannon.”
- “I apologize.”
- “It’s never been meant sarcastically.”
Show Me the Evidence!
While he handed over the PPO evidence to the Chinese daily Lianhe Wanbao, he kept it from us—lawyers fretted, “we don’t want that leaking.”
Inside the PPO Claims
Joshua detailed that Low’s allegations claimed he was irresponsible, violent when playing with their son Jed, and that he’d swung him too hard. He argues:
- “Has my son ever been injured because of me swinging him too hard?”
- “It’s a normal father‑son thing.”
- “The judge mostly agrees with me, and I have texts to prove it.”
All in all, the drama’s settled at a slow pect. But with both sides on opposite ends of the battlefield, the next—who knows—chasing of public tweets might still begin. Stay tuned to see who will put the finishing touch on this high‑school‑style breakup!
‘I was the one taking care of my kid’
Dad’s Monday Struggle: A Courtroom Drama Over a Playdate
Meet Joshua: the dad who fought over a single Thursday night with his kid Jed.
Back in the Day—School Runs and Bedtime Bounces
- In the old days, Joshua and his wife’d take the little guy to school together. He’d always be the one grabbing him on the way back.
- After she launched her own business last December, the night‑shift became her new favorite “party.” From then until around early March, Joshua was the overnight guardian, putting Jed to bed while she danced her way around town with friends.
- He says, “She needs her space, I respect that. I’m the one actually taking care of my kid.”
The One‑Day‑per‑Week Fight
Joshua’s frustration boils down to this: he’s been denied days to see Jed, yet he fights a court order for just one day a week. “Is that fair?” he asks. “I’m ready to do my part, but she blocks me and then calls me irresponsible.” He says he’s been left out for over 190 days—a long wait for a child’s birthday!
The Escalation After the Breakup
- On June 2, the couple decided to take a break. For the first week, everything was fine; Joshua could visit the kid.
- After a week or two, the visits slipped to video chats. Then, when things hit a rough patch, she shut him down entirely—no video call, no in‑person sightings.
- She finally said, “I don’t want you seeing my son.” Joshua’s reaction? “I was stepping up, and she pulled back. How do I get the right to be a dad again?”
So it’s not just a custody battle—it’s a tug‑of‑war over a simple Sunday night. If you’ve ever felt like an overlooked dad, Joshua’s story might hit a familiar chord.
Policemen were actually around
Joshua’s Home Retrieval Saga
The 15th of August: A Police-Packed Party
Picture this: Joshua swings back into his house on August 15th, ready to reclaim what’s rightfully his. He shows up with not one, not two, but four cops on standby—yes, the kind of turnout that makes a courtroom feel like a basic pajama party.
Two Troops, Three Problems
- First Two: The guys who actually let him in. They’re cool, all.
- Second Two: “Help me scoop out my stuff!”—their role is to make sure no one’s messing with the stuff.
And there’s the silly PIN saga. Joshua tells the story: “The lady in question, Low, refused to spill the beans—no PIN, no password. The police even had to hiss, ‘She’s stubborn! You’ve got to bring in a locksmith!’” A locksmith? Someone who can open fronts.
The Lockdown Procedure
- Door opens, the wizards of law step in.
- Shannon’s mom, being the ring‑in the tune, cracks the door open.
- Shannon eventually re‑drops in, and the police do their paperwork: “Did Joshua knock?”, “Was anything missing?”
- Low, after double‑checking, says, “Nope. All these items are his!” So, it’s like a “You’re the hero” moment.
Half‑Hearted Accusations…
Low later threw a light‑bulb on the scene, shouting, “Joshua just stole the house!” Which is a classic case of: “I’d love to think he was a thief, but unfortunately, that’s the perception I’m fighting.” He insists the police case file backs his story, and the whole thing? It’s a practice of the kind that tarnishes reputations faster than a bad meme spreads.
Joshua’s Bottom Line
Here’s the bottom line: Joshua’s intent was simple—“Get my stuff.” What he got back? A courtroom soundtrack of accusations, and the realization that being misunderstood is usually more exhausting than whatever locker door he had to open.
Denied access to the utility bills
Joshua’s Silent Showdown with Low Over Big‑Bill Drama
Picture this: a former child star trying to make sense of a spat that’s turned into an Instagram headline, yet all the juicy details are tucked away behind a wall of silence.
The Flick: Why the Power’s Off?
- Low’s decision: According to Joshua, Low “changed the PIN to my mailbox” and stopped handing over the bills. He says she simply didn’t want to share them.
- Joshua’s plea: “I couldn’t get hold of my bills,” he explains. “She didn’t want to give me access.”
- Instagram’s one‑sided story: Low’s claim was put forward without this backstory, leaving fans only with her perspective.
Joshua’s Two‑Sided Narrative
He argues there’s more to the story than what’s posted online. “There are two sides to a story,” Joshua says, and so far the public has only heard Low’s version.
He adds a philosophical twist:
“This is the thing about humans. Whoever has the loudest voice will become the leader of the group. At the moment, she has the loudest voice.”
Protecting the Little Guy
Joshua keeps his silence not because he’s weak, but because he won’t let his son see the ugly side of fights. “I want to protect my son,” he says. “If I talk s* about my wife, my son grows up and sees it. What kind of picture does that paint?”
He continues, “She’s still the mother to my child. I don’t want to fight; I want to stop already.”
